Re: [PATCH] taskset: fix memory leaks when exiting on error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 13:31 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 06:46:42AM -0300, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:44:17 -0300
> > Subject: [PATCH] taskset: fix memory leaks when exiting on error
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  schedutils/taskset.c |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/schedutils/taskset.c b/schedutils/taskset.c
> > index 201fc15..8094c5d 100644
> > --- a/schedutils/taskset.c
> > +++ b/schedutils/taskset.c
> > @@ -125,8 +125,10 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> >  
> >  	buflen = 7 * cur_nbits;
> >  	buf = malloc(buflen);
> > -	if (!buf)
> > +	if (!buf) {
> > +		cpuset_free(cur_set);
> >  		err(EXIT_FAILURE, _("malloc failed"));
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * new_set is always used for the sched_setaffinity call
> > @@ -134,12 +136,17 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> >  	 * cpumask_t if the user's mask is shorter.
> >  	 */
> >  	new_set = cpuset_alloc(ncpus, &new_setsize, NULL);
> > -	if (!new_set)
> > +	if (!new_set) {
> > +		free(buf);
> > +		cpuset_free(cur_set);
> >  		err(EXIT_FAILURE, _("cpuset_alloc failed"));
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	if (pid) {
> > -		if (sched_getaffinity(pid, cur_setsize, cur_set) < 0)
> > -			err(EXIT_FAILURE, _("failed to get pid %d's affinity"), pid);
> > +		if (sched_getaffinity(pid, cur_setsize, cur_set) < 0) {
> > +			fprintf(stderr, _("failed to get pid %d's affinity"), pid);
> > +			goto err_free;
> 
>  I know about this problem, but I have doubts that this pedantic point
>  of view and the extra code makes any real effect. After exit() all 
>  memory will be deallocated... I think it's better in this example to
>  call err() and keep the code simple and readable.
> 

Fair enough. I ran into this when looking to use the xalloc stuff, so we
just might want to change cpuset_alloc() to use xmalloc instead of
malloc and be done with it.

Davidlohr

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux