On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:12:07PM +0200, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> realloc(NULL, size) behaves the same as malloc(size) so there is no need
> to distinguish between the two.
Applied with a small change, thanks
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mount/lomount.c | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mount/lomount.c b/mount/lomount.c
> index 54b9f8e..4cbc3bf 100644
> --- a/mount/lomount.c
> +++ b/mount/lomount.c
> @@ -259,8 +259,7 @@ loop_scandir(const char *dirname, int **ary, int hasprefix)
> continue;
> if (count + 1 > arylen) {
> arylen += 1;
> - *ary = *ary ? realloc(*ary, arylen * sizeof(int)) :
> - malloc(arylen * sizeof(int));
> + *ary = realloc(*ary, arylen * sizeof(int));
> if (!*ary)
here should be free()
> return -1;
> }
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
