On Wednesday 13 January 2010 04:21:02 Karel Zak wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 03:23:34PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > glibc-2.10 has an error in it where it forgot to export the fallocate64 > > symbol for 32bit users. the current util-linux configure script does a > > link test for > > Can't we bypass glibc and use syscall() when the broken glibc is > detected? that is fine too of course. but the real issue is still in detecting the broken fallocate situation i think. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
