On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 02:48:51AM -0400, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Jul 16, 2009 19:59 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > +Build-Depends: texi2html (>= 1.76), gettext, texinfo, dc, pkg-config, dietlibc-dev (>> 0.30) [alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc ppc64 s390 sparc], debhelper (>= 7.0), libblkid-dev (>= 2.16), libuuid-dev (>= 2.16) > > Same question as for libblkid-dev... Ideally, even thought the package > version is 2.x, the ABI hasn't changed (AFAIK, that was a hard requirement) > so this should really still be called libuuid1 for compatibility. The so version number for the package is still 1; so the packages containing the binary shared libraries are libuuid1 and libblkid1. What gets confusing is that version numbers for libblkid-dev, libuuid-dev, libblkid1, and libuuid1 will be 2.16.x, not because of any soversion number, but because that's the version number of util-linux-ng. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
