Re: Two 'make install' to get mount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 Hi,

On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 10:42:16PM +0200, spam.spam.spam.spam@xxxxxxx wrote:
> I have a little problem with util-linux-ng 2.15.
> 
> If I only do :
> make install DESTDIR=/tmp/foo-build
> There is no 'mount' in /tmp/foo-build/bin/.

 I can't reproduce this problem:

   $ make install DESTDIR=/tmp/foo-build &> /dev/null

   $ ll /tmp/foo-build/bin/mount
   -rwsr-xr-x 1 kzak kzak 210302 2009-06-09 22:54 /tmp/foo-build/bin/mount


 Note that a simple 'make install' is pretty generic in all deb/rpm
 source packages.

> Why mount isn't installed by default when I do a simple 'make install'?

 Please, check 'make install' output.

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux