klibc vs. libblkid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 [I found this old e-mail in my TODO list.]

On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 05:26:53PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:23:10PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> >  I'm already working on vol_id + blkid merge
> > 
> >     http://git.kernel.org/?p=utils/util-linux-ng/util-linux-ng.git;a=shortlog;h=topic/fsprobe
> > 
> >  My plan is follow ideas and code from blkid and add a new low-level API
> >  for udev. That's all.
> 
> could you also integrate the requirements for fstype klibc,
> so that we can kill the third place of needed fs recognition patches.

 The libblkid (from util-linux-ng) is ready for the first release.

 Now I'm collecting things for the next release (May or so). If I good
 understand klibc requirement is FSSIZE value which is based on
 information from FS superblok. Right?

    Karel

> hpa formulated them a while ago, searching,
> http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/2006-February/001345.html
> 
> concerning initramfs volume_id added --probe-all, before it
> used to guess wrongly, so currently we prefer klibc fstype.

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux