hello karel,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:16:27PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:39:39AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:24:49AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
<snipp>
> >
> > well not directly, but right klibc-utils should have proper syntax.
> > initramfs-tools currently uses belows syntax. before we unmounted
> > and remounted, which is much uglier.
> >
> > or even better have the util-linux-ng mount compiled against klibc,
>
> this is the best solution and it's in our TODO for more than one
> year. But nobody works on that...
it is quite easy, on a debian box you only need to install libklibc-dev,
pass
./configure CC=klcc --without-ncurses
cd mount
make
by the way i'm getting this warning on such a configure run:
configure: WARNING: sys/io.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: sys/io.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: sys/io.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: sys/io.h: section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled"
configure: WARNING: sys/io.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result
configure: WARNING: sys/io.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence
configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------ ##
configure: WARNING: ## Report this to kzak@xxxxxxxxxx ##
configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------ ##
lomount errors on:
lomount.c:253: error: â??versionsortâ?? undeclared (first use in this function)
hmm i see no, scandir on klibc side.
hehe seems also you got some small patches for klibc support ;)
> If you create some restricted and incompatible environment (e.g.
> "only short options") you shouldn't expect that standard system utils
> are ready to blindly follow this your decision.
>
> BTW, I don't understand what is bad on long options. Any idea?
mount in klibc-utils is far from feature complete, can't even print out
current mount status. guess it was just done q&d and thus..
size may play a role, for most purposes in initramfs it is enough for us.
> > > -o {remount,bind,rbind,owner,noowner,groups,nogroups,_netdev,
> > > comment,loop}
> >
> > so they are all getting deprecated?
>
> No. The reason why we support these options is /etc/fstab (the "-o"
> is a command line alternative to /etc/fstab mount options).
>
> The "move" is unsupported in /etc/fstab.
i see thanks for explanation.
--
maks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
