On Monday 07 April 2008, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Karel Zak wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:50:47PM +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> > > printf (_("System type of partition %d is unchanged "
> > > - "to %x (%s)\n"), i + 1, sys, temp);
> > > + "at %x (%s)\n"), i + 1, sys, temp);
> >
> > ^^^
> > why? I think the original message with "to" is correct.
>
> something is "changed to a new value",
yes
> or it is "unchanged at some value".
i dont think so ... "at" is generally for a location, not for describing
values (at least in this instance). if the message took the form of "value
FOO at offset MOO", then "at" would be appropriate. but i dont think that's
the case.
> Or if you prefer: "...is unchanged: %x (%s)\n"
changing the wording to not using "to" nor "at" would be best i think.
-mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
