On Jan 17 2008 11:33, Neil Brown wrote: >On Thursday January 17, jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> On Jan 17 2008 00:43, Karel Zak wrote: >> >> >> >> Seems like a plain bad idea to me. There will be any number of home-made >> >> /proc/mounts parsers and we don't know what they do. >> > >> > So, let's use /proc/mounts_v2 ;-) >> >> Was not it like "don't use /proc for new things"? > >I thought it was "don't use /proc for new things that aren't process >related". > >And as the mount table is per process...... You are right. I'm still in the world where CLONE_NEWNS is not used all that much in the daily routine, either by the distro or by me. >In the tradition of stat, statm, status, maybe the former should be > /proc/$PID/mountm What next - /proc/pid/mountus? :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
