Re: MS_DIRSYNC vs MS_REPLACE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 05:34:00PM -0400, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> >>>  I don't see MS_{REPLACE,AFTER,BEFORE,OVER} in linux-2.6/include/linux/fs.h.
> >>>  Is it unimplemented stuff? If yes, I'd like to remove it mount(8).
> >> There's an off-tree unionfs.  Does it use these options maybe?
> > 
> > They aren't part of that tree's include/linux/fs.h file:
> 
> Well, if we end up kicking these flags, thus freing up a couple of
> extra bits, I may simplify my patch and the mount code by converting
> the SETLOOP_* flags to MS_* flags.
> 
> Would a patch for doing that be welcome?

 I think your original patch is fine. We shouldn't mix anything with
 MS_* flags.

    Karel


-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux