Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 08 October 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fix gcc warnings from:
(try compilation with "-Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2")
mount_mntent.c:28: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of
'strlen' differ in signedness mount_mntent.c:129: warning: pointer targets
in passing argument 1 of 'mangle' differ in signedness mount_mntent.c:130:
warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'mangle' differ in
signedness mount_mntent.c:131: warning: pointer targets in passing argument
1 of 'mangle' differ in signedness mount_mntent.c:132: warning: pointer
targets in passing argument 1 of 'mangle' differ in signedness
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mount/mount_mntent.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- util-linux-ng-2.13.orig/mount/mount_mntent.c
+++ util-linux-ng-2.13/mount/mount_mntent.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ mangle(const unsigned char *s) {
char *ss, *sp;
int n;
- n = strlen(s);
+ n = strlen((const char *)s);
ss = sp = xmalloc(4*n+1);
while(1) {
for (n = 0; n < sizeof(need_escaping); n++) {
@@ -126,10 +126,10 @@ my_addmntent (mntFILE *mfp, struct my_mn
if (fseek (mfp->mntent_fp, 0, SEEK_END))
return 1; /* failure */
- m1 = mangle(mnt->mnt_fsname);
- m2 = mangle(mnt->mnt_dir);
- m3 = mangle(mnt->mnt_type);
- m4 = mangle(mnt->mnt_opts);
+ m1 = mangle((const unsigned char *)mnt->mnt_fsname);
+ m2 = mangle((const unsigned char *)mnt->mnt_dir);
+ m3 = mangle((const unsigned char *)mnt->mnt_type);
+ m4 = mangle((const unsigned char *)mnt->mnt_opts);
res = fprintf (mfp->mntent_fp, "%s %s %s %s %d %d\n",
m1, m2, m3, m4, mnt->mnt_freq, mnt->mnt_passno);
considering mangle() works on filenames, and the signedness of such strings is
irrelevant, why not change it to take a "char *" instead of adding ugly casts
all over the place
I'm not fond of the casting either, but ISTM that the real problem is in the
top-level makefile. This is what causes most of the problems AFAICT:
AM_CFLAGS = -fsigned-char
but I suppose that it has some history/baggage along with it that I don't
know about.
And if mangle() just takes a "char *", casts are still needed, aren't they?
--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html