On Thursday 10 May 2007, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 07:43 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Thursday 10 May 2007, Matthias Koenig wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 01:06:56PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > >> what i'm getting at is udev is a linux-2.6ism so relying on it kind > > > >> of sucks i think ... e2fsprogs is for all linux versions ... > > > > > > I won't even dare to try to start a "which lib is better discussion", > > > this will lead us nowhere. > > > > you misinterpret i think ... i could care less between the libs, what i > > said is that hard depending on a package that generally only exists/makes > > sense for linux-2.6+ users sucks > > Come on, nothing depends on it. yes, it has been mentioned *since my original comment* that mount will support both libs and people can choose ... it still doesnt change the fact that my comment is correct since it was written in general terms -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
