On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 12:33:54 +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> As a comment in the file notes, doing too small a granularity for erases
> has considerable effect on performance:
>
> > Example Samsung eMMC 8GTF4:
> >
> > time erase /dev/mmc2.part_of_512m # 1024 trims
> > time: 2849ms
> >
> > time erase /dev/mmc2.part_of_512m # single trim
> > time: 56ms
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/2] mci: core: import Linux logic for higher preferred erase size
https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=cffa32cbd510 (link may not be stable)
[2/2] mci: core: reset ERASE_GRP_DEF on startup
https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/barebox/commit/?id=b2c8b27dd73d (link may not be stable)
Best regards,
--
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
