Hi Marco,
On 22.11.24 11:28, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Hi Ahmad,
>
> On 24-11-22, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> When the code was first added, a kzalloc was allocating the memory for
>> the struct device. This has been recently changed to malloc as a
>> shifting of the header caused the function to be no longer defined.
>>
>> malloc() doesn't zero the memory though, leading to a potential freeing
>> of uninitialized memory in dev_set_name.
>>
>> Fix this by using calloc() instead. Reintroducing kzalloc() would be
>> fine too, but calloc() saves some space, because it guarantees a smaller
>> alignment.
>>
>> Fixes: d9fa8b26b60c ("usb: typec: fix compile test with CONFIG_SANDBOX")
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/typec/class.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/class.c b/drivers/usb/typec/class.c
>> index 495ac794622f..9f9b4d6ca8f3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/class.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/class.c
>> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ struct typec_port *typec_register_port(struct device *parent,
>> const char *alias;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - port = malloc(sizeof(*port));
>> + port = calloc(sizeof(*port), 1);
>
> Albeit it is a nit and result is the same, the nmemb is the first
> argument of calloc().
Thanks, I can never remember the order, so it's a good thing it
doesn't matter anyway. :-)
Cheers,
Ahmad
>
> Regards,
> Marco
>
>> if (!port)
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>
>> --
>> 2.39.5
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
