On 15.10.24 10:37, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> On 15.10.24 10:31, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 10:20:29AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>>> Should've been part of the original patch.
>>> This fixes CI failure for ARM64.
>>
>> The patch you are fixing here doesn't apply on any of my for-next
>> branches. I'll drop it for now and apply it right after the next release
>> instead.
>
> Sure, no problem.
This is still broken in next (master is fine).
Should I resend the last patch or can you squash this fixup?
Thanks,
Ahmad
>
> Thanks,
> Ahmad
>
>>
>> Sascha
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/cpu/mmu_64.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/mmu_64.c b/arch/arm/cpu/mmu_64.c
>>> index 94a19b1aec3c..bc1a44d0a7b8 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/mmu_64.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/mmu_64.c
>>> @@ -390,9 +390,9 @@ void dma_flush_range(void *ptr, size_t size)
>>> v8_flush_dcache_range(start, end);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -void *dma_alloc_writecombine(size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle)
>>> +void *dma_alloc_writecombine(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle)
>>> {
>>> - return dma_alloc_map(size, dma_handle, ARCH_MAP_WRITECOMBINE);
>>> + return dma_alloc_map(dev, size, dma_handle, ARCH_MAP_WRITECOMBINE);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void init_range(size_t total_level0_tables)
>>> --
>>> 2.39.5
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
