The bridge device is specifically created for purposes of the FPGA
bridge framework. There should thus be no naming clashes and
-ENOMEM is not a fatal error there either, because the PWM C API
is still usable without the device parameters.
Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
index 5db24cb5bd74..0ca8a2b513e9 100644
--- a/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
+++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
@@ -183,7 +183,6 @@ int fpga_bridge_register(struct device *dev, const char *name,
const struct fpga_bridge_ops *br_ops, void *priv)
{
struct fpga_bridge *bridge;
- struct param_d *p;
int ret = 0;
if (!name || !strlen(name)) {
@@ -213,10 +212,8 @@ int fpga_bridge_register(struct device *dev, const char *name,
dev->priv = bridge;
bridge->enable = 0;
- p = dev_add_param_bool(&bridge->dev, "enable", set_enable,
- NULL, &bridge->enable, bridge);
- if (IS_ERR(p))
- return PTR_ERR(p);
+ dev_add_param_bool(&bridge->dev, "enable", set_enable,
+ NULL, &bridge->enable, bridge);
of_platform_populate(dev->of_node, NULL, dev);
--
2.39.2
