Hi Sascha,
Thank you.
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 02:13:59PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi Tomas,
>
> Thanks for the patch. I applied it with some minor adjustments.
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 09:49:09AM +0200, Tomas Marek wrote:
> > +static void i2c_msg_to_efi_op(
> > + const struct efi_i2c_priv *i2c_priv,
> > + const struct i2c_msg *msg,
> > + struct efi_i2c_operation **op)
>
> No need to pass a pointer to a pointer to the array, changed that to
> *op.
I'm afraid this won't work. The **op was an in/out pointer to the EFI
request operation array. The incremented pointer value was used by
subsequent calls to i2c_msg_to_efi_op(). If a pointer is used instead
of a pointer to a pointer, the op variable in the
i2c_msgs_to_efi_transaction() function isn't modified, and all I2C
messages are now stored in the first item of the EFI operations array.
>
> > +{
> > + unsigned int max_len = efi_i2c_max_len(i2c_priv, msg);
> > + unsigned int remaining = msg->len;
> > + u32 flags;
> > +
> > + flags = (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) ? EFI_I2C_FLAG_READ : 0;
> > +
> > + do {
> > + unsigned int len = (remaining < max_len) ? remaining : max_len;
>
> We have a min() macro I used instead.
Perfect, thanks for the hint.
Best regards
Tomas
>
> Sascha
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
