On 26.03.24 11:33, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 03:24:24PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> Most barebox platforms are either completely cache-coherent with respect to
>> DMA or completely non-coherent. To avoid having to walk the device tree for
>> non-existent dma-coherent and dma-noncohrent properties, barebox thus
>> only does this when CONFIG_OF_DMA_COHERENCY is selected.
>>
>> CONFIG_OF_DMA_COHERENCY is to be selected by platforms that have mixed
>> coherency for DMA masters. Forgetting to select this option can be
>> annoying to debug, which is why devinfo will inform the user of default
>> DMA coherency assignments:
>>
>> DMA Coherent: false (default)
>>
>> In order to allow devinfo to differentiate implicit default and explicit
>> device tree DMA coherency configuration, the struct device::dma_coherent
>> member is not of boolean type, but Instead an enumeration that besides
>> coherent and non-coherent also encodes a DEV_DMA_COHERENCE_DEFAULT state.
>>
>> In practice though, a boolean was saved in this dma_coherent member,
>> leading to any dma-noncoherent property being ignored and the default
>> coherency setting being taken for the node.
>>
>> By fixing the type confusion, we restore working Ethernet on the
>> StarFive JH7100, which is the only SoC we currently support that
>> requires /soc/dma-noncohrent to be set for proper operation of its DMA
>> masters.
>>
>> Fixes: fbdea8fd54fe ("of: populate new device_d::dma_coherent attribute")
>> Reported-by: Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/of/platform.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
>> index ec1482b27797..e2c252b1ffee 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
>> @@ -90,6 +90,21 @@ static struct device_node *of_get_next_dma_parent(const struct device_node *np)
>> return args.np;
>> }
>>
>> +static enum dev_dma_coherence of_dma_get_coherence(struct device_node *node)
>> +{
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_DMA_COHERENCY)) {
>> + while (node) {
>> + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "dma-coherent"))
>> + return DEV_DMA_COHERENT;
>> + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "dma-noncoherent"))
>> + return DEV_DMA_NON_COHERENT;
>> + node = of_get_next_dma_parent(node);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return DEV_DMA_COHERENCE_DEFAULT;
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * of_dma_is_coherent - Check if device is coherent
>> * @np: device node
>> @@ -101,17 +116,14 @@ static struct device_node *of_get_next_dma_parent(const struct device_node *np)
>> */
>> bool of_dma_is_coherent(struct device_node *node)
>> {
>> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_DMA_COHERENCY)) {
>> - while (node) {
>> - if (of_property_read_bool(node, "dma-coherent"))
>> - return true;
>> - if (of_property_read_bool(node, "dma-noncoherent"))
>> - return false;
>> - node = of_get_next_dma_parent(node);
>> - }
>> + switch (of_dma_get_coherence(node)) {
>> + case DEV_DMA_COHERENT:
>> + return true;
>> + case DEV_DMA_NON_COHERENT:
>> + return false;
>> + case DEV_DMA_COHERENCE_DEFAULT:
>> + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT);
>> }
>> -
>> - return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT);
>> }
>
> This brings us:
>
> drivers/of/platform.c: In function 'of_dma_is_coherent':
> drivers/of/platform.c:127:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
>
> what shall we return in the default case? also
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT)?
Yes. Either that or BUG()/__builtin_unreachable();
Thanks,
Ahmad
>
> Sascha
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
