On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 02:25:04PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> GCC complains about ino not being defined in some cases, which appears
> to be a false positive. Nevertheless, initialize it to the same fallback
> value used in ext4fs_get_ino, which is called below.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ext4/ext_barebox.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied, thanks
Sascha
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext_barebox.c b/fs/ext4/ext_barebox.c
> index 93dc9b4b1471..df82b629cd05 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext_barebox.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext_barebox.c
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static struct dentry *ext_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
> unsigned int flags)
> {
> struct ext2fs_node *e2dir = to_ext2_node(dir);
> - int ret, ino;
> + int ret, ino = 0;
> struct inode *inode;
>
> ret = ext4fs_get_ino(e2dir, &dentry->d_name, &ino);
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
