On 23-06-13, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> On 02.06.23 09:49, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Drop the device_node after we are done.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> There's no leakage fixed here. of_node_put is a no-op in barebox
> and even in the kernel, it only does reference counting when
> CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC=y.
Didn't noticed that of_node_put() is a no-op but since barebox does
start to handle of-overlays for its own devicetrees we should reconsider
that.
> I don't mind if change is to align with kernel, so with commit
> message reworded:
Sure.
Regards,
Marco
>
> Reviewed-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/of/of_gpio.c | 10 +++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/of_gpio.c b/drivers/of/of_gpio.c
> > index c20133bbfd..76398f7542 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/of_gpio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/of_gpio.c
> > @@ -76,16 +76,17 @@ int of_get_named_gpio_flags(struct device_node *np, const char *propname,
> > if (!dev) {
> > pr_debug("%s: unable to find device of node %s\n",
> > __func__, gpiospec.np->full_name);
> > - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + goto out;
> > }
> >
> > ret = gpio_get_num(dev, gpiospec.args[0]);
> > if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > - return ret;
> > + goto out;
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > pr_err("%s: unable to get gpio num of device %s: %d\n",
> > __func__, dev_name(dev), ret);
> > - return ret;
> > + goto out;
> > }
> >
> > if (flags) {
> > @@ -93,6 +94,9 @@ int of_get_named_gpio_flags(struct device_node *np, const char *propname,
> > of_gpio_flags_quirks(np, propname, flags, index);
> > }
> >
> > +out:
> > + of_node_put(gpiospec.np);
> > +
> > return ret;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_named_gpio_flags);
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>
>
