On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 02:59:08PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > Syncing device trees with Linux upstream can lead to breakage, when > the device trees are switched to newer bindings, which are not yet > supported in barebox. To make it easier to spot such issues, we want to > start applying some heuristics to flag possibly problematic DT changes. > > One step towards being able to do that is to know what nodes barebox > actually consumes. Most of the nodes have a compatible entry, which is > matched by an array of of_device_id, so let's have MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE > point at it for future extraction. > > Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- Applied, thanks Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
