On 17.05.23 11:03, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> The different arm_mem_* functions all follow the same pattern of
> taking the base address of the upper region minus the size of the
> current region and with the exception of arm_mem_scratch_get() they
> are all below each other. arm_mem_scratch_get() doesn't fit into
> this row, so move it lower.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h
> index 8d8c102081..f5a74b4746 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/barebox-arm.h
> @@ -81,11 +81,6 @@ static inline unsigned long arm_mem_scratch(unsigned long endmem)
> return arm_mem_optee(endmem) - SZ_32K;
> }
>
> -static inline const void *arm_mem_scratch_get(void)
> -{
> - return (const void *)arm_mem_scratch(arm_mem_endmem_get());
> -}
> -
> static inline unsigned long arm_mem_stack(unsigned long endmem)
> {
> return arm_mem_scratch(endmem) - STACK_SIZE;
> @@ -125,6 +120,11 @@ static inline unsigned long arm_mem_stack_top(unsigned long endmem)
> return arm_mem_stack(endmem) + STACK_SIZE;
> }
>
> +static inline const void *arm_mem_scratch_get(void)
> +{
> + return (const void *)arm_mem_scratch(arm_mem_endmem_get());
> +}
> +
> static inline unsigned long arm_mem_barebox_image(unsigned long membase,
> unsigned long endmem,
> unsigned long size)
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
