Hi Ahmad,
On 23-02-21, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> We have some instances of device_d and driver_d still lingering in
> documentation and commented out code. Let's drop these as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <ahmad@xxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devel/porting.rst | 2 +-
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c | 2 +-
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h | 2 +-
> fs/cramfs/cramfs.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/mfd/core.h | 2 +-
> include/platform_data/eth-smc911x.h | 2 +-
> include/platform_data/serial-ns16550.h | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devel/porting.rst b/Documentation/devel/porting.rst
> index 8af0456ab2d5..619c5e49e00f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devel/porting.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/devel/porting.rst
> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ tree binding, you can write a driver that matches against your board's
> { /* sentinel */ },
> };
>
> - static struct driver_d my_board_driver = {
> + static struct driver my_board_driver = {
> .name = "board-mine",
> .probe = my_board_probe,
> .of_compatible = my_board_of_match,
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c
> index e8e690311148..c7252ce72a27 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_omap_gpmc.c
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
> * A typical device registration is as follows:
> *
> * @code
> - * static struct device_d my_nand_device = {
> + * static struct device my_nand_device = {
> * .name = "gpmc_nand",
> * .id = some identifier you need to show.. e.g. "gpmc_nand0"
> * .resource[0].start = GPMC base address
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h
> index a0467ff3c465..c9a0a8eed662 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ struct musb {
> u16 int_rx;
> u16 int_tx;
>
> - //struct device_d *phydev;
> + //struct device *phydev;
IMHO this line can be removed completely.
Regards,
Marco
