Em qua., 15 de fev. de 2023 às 11:11, Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 14:53, Otavio Salvador > <otavio.salvador@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think the Barebox inside OE-Core allows a bigger integration and > > reuse of existing tooling for signing and other classes currently well > > integrated with U-Boot. For me, a critical point for decision is if > > Pengutronix will commit to support it. > > You should be well aware there's a history of people contributing > stuff to core and even assigning themselves as maintainers, then > disappearing. And then it falls (largely) on me to keep things > (barely) going. What happens if ptx withdraws its commitment? Can I > then send a commit that removes barebox from core? Imagine the angry > lynch mob that will show up after my head. Yes. If no one maintains, it should be removed. People will get mad but then we'll see more commitment in future. > Adding things to core is a decision that cannot be easily reversed, so > I'd rather have barebox in meta-barebox for a while, with any needed > fixing to classes and infra in core. Sure but adding things to the core should still be possible and it is a place to foster work sharing and contribution. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
