On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 12:01:15PM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote:
> On 22-11-02, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 09:44:41AM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > > > +static void dump_fcb_n(struct fcb_block **fcbs, int n)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int i;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!n || !fcbs[n])
> > > > + goto skip_compare;
> > > > +
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > > > + if (!fcbs[i] || !fcbs[n])
> > > > + continue;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!memcmp(fcbs[i], fcbs[n], sizeof(struct fcb_block))) {
> > > > + printf("FCB block#%d: same as FCB block#%d\n", n, i);
> > > > + return;
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > +skip_compare:
> > > > + if (fcbs[n]) {
> > > > + printf("FCB block#%d:\n", n);
> > > > + dump_fcb(fcbs[n]);
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + printf("FCB block#%d: NULL\n", n);
> > > > + }
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_IMX28
> > >
> > > Why this #ifdef? Can't we do this by cpu_is_mx28()?
> >
> > i.MX28 is a different architecture in barebox, it's in
> > arch/arm/mach-mxs/. We do not have the cpu_is_mx7() and cpu_is_mx6ul()
> > macros there.
>
> Argh.. always messing the mxs/mxc stuff up in my head. Got your point,
> but shouldn't we add the macros instead of adding the #ifdef here?
Right. We have several cpu_is_mx* macros there already, so we can just
add the missing ones and avoid the ifdeffery.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
