On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:11:22AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Having flash@0 in the binding example is misleading, because lookup is
> global. Point that out explicitly and modify the example.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <ahmad@xxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.rst | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks
Sascha
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.rst b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.rst
> index 6db54070a991..627b59eda04b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.rst
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Representing flash partitions in devicetree
> In addition to the upstream binding, another property is added:
>
> Optional properties:
> -- ``partuuid`` : The partition UUID for this partition.
> +- ``partuuid`` : The global partition UUID for this partition.
>
> Additionally, barebox also supports partitioning the eMMC boot partitions if
> the partition table node is named appropriately:
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Examples:
>
> .. code-block:: none
>
> - flash@0 {
> + / {
> partitions {
> compatible = "fixed-partitions";
> #address-cells = <1>;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
