On 24.10.22 14:09, Holger Assmann wrote:
> This commit adds support for the TQ MBa8MPxL with TQMa8MPxL module with
> i.MX8M Plus Quad/Dual SoC. This very combination results in configuration
> symbol "MACH_TQ_MBA8MPXL". A possible variant based on i.MX8M Plus Dual
> would be supported transparently, once barebox deleted the CPU nodes
> when it detects that they were fused away. It already does so for
> i.MX8MM and i.MX8MN.
>
> We use the respective Linux upstream device trees and their implications
> regarding hardware support.
>
> Known to be unsupported for now is the second Ethernet interface around
> the eqos dwmac IP. This has to be resolved by porting over the fitting
> wrapper from Linux.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonard Göhrs <l.goehrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Holger Assmann <h.assmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +/ {
> + chosen {
> + environment-sd {
> + compatible = "barebox,environment";
> + device-path = &usdhc2, "partname:barebox-environment";
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> + environment-emmc {
> + compatible = "barebox,environment";
> + device-path = &usdhc3, "partname:barebox-environment";
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> + };
> +};
Sascha recently removed many instances of the partname: binding.
I just sent a fixup for your commit doing the same. If there are
no objections to v1, Sascha can squash patches at apply time,
otherwise, please fold it into your patch for v2.
Cheers,
Ahmad
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
