Hi Enrico, On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 03:37:30PM +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote: > Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > For debugging, it can be useful to reference GPIOs relative to a > > controller, e.g.: > > > > gpio_direction_output -d gpio4 20 1 > > > > - if (argc < count) > > + if (optind < count) > > return COMMAND_ERROR_USAGE; > > This change seems to make '-d ...' mandatory. E.g. > > | :/ gpio_get_value 65 > | > | gpio_get_value - return value of a GPIO pin > | > | Usage: gpio_get_value [-d CONTROLLER] GPIO > Thanks for reporting. Here is a fix for that Sascha -----------------------------8<--------------------------- >From 7c797eb87385522ce1ec1ba44315ba386d82978d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 16:33:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] gpio: Fix gpio commands called without -d option 04443dc5fc breaks the calculation of arguments needed which effectively makes the -d option mandatory. Fix this. Fixes: 04443dc5fc ("commands: gpio: add -d argument to set/get commands") Reported-by: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- commands/gpio.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/commands/gpio.c b/commands/gpio.c index d04fd65bc8..5e5eb20583 100644 --- a/commands/gpio.c +++ b/commands/gpio.c @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ static int get_gpio_and_value(int argc, char *argv[], { struct gpio_chip *chip = NULL; struct device_d *dev; - int count = 2; + int count = 1; int ret = 0; int opt; @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static int get_gpio_and_value(int argc, char *argv[], if (value) count++; - if (optind < count) + if (argc < optind + count) return COMMAND_ERROR_USAGE; *gpio = gpio_find_by_name(argv[optind]); -- 2.30.2 -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |