Hi Sascha,
On 9/21/22 11:17, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 01:39:47PM +0200, Michael Riesch wrote:
>> After the removal of the IO domain configuration code, the low-level
>> initialization is the same for all RK356x boards. Add a common
>> method rk3568_start to remove this code duplication.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boards/pine64-quartz64/lowlevel.c | 30 +----------------
>> arch/arm/boards/radxa-rock3/lowlevel.c | 27 ---------------
>> .../arm/boards/rockchip-rk3568-evb/lowlevel.c | 33 +------------------
>> .../arm/mach-rockchip/include/mach/rockchip.h | 1 +
>> arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3568.c | 24 ++++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/pine64-quartz64/lowlevel.c b/arch/arm/boards/pine64-quartz64/lowlevel.c
>> index b295885522..e1beb3e624 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boards/pine64-quartz64/lowlevel.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boards/pine64-quartz64/lowlevel.c
>> @@ -1,39 +1,11 @@
>> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> #include <common.h>
>> -#include <linux/sizes.h>
>> -#include <asm/barebox-arm-head.h>
>> #include <asm/barebox-arm.h>
>> -#include <mach/hardware.h>
>> -#include <mach/atf.h>
>> -#include <debug_ll.h>
>> #include <mach/rockchip.h>
>>
>> extern char __dtb_rk3566_quartz64_a_start[];
>>
>> -static noinline void start_quartz64(void *fdt)
>> -{
>> - /*
>> - * Image execution starts at 0x0, but this is used for ATF and
>> - * OP-TEE later, so move away from here.
>> - */
>> - if (current_el() == 3)
>> - relocate_to_adr_full(RK3568_BAREBOX_LOAD_ADDRESS);
>> - else
>> - relocate_to_current_adr();
>> -
>> - setup_c();
>> -
>> - if (current_el() == 3) {
>> - rk3568_lowlevel_init();
>> - rk3568_atf_load_bl31(fdt);
>> - /* not reached */
>> - }
>> -
>> - barebox_arm_entry(RK3568_DRAM_BOTTOM, 0x80000000 - RK3568_DRAM_BOTTOM,
>> - fdt);
>> -}
>> -
>> ENTRY_FUNCTION(start_quartz64a, r0, r1, r2)
>> {
>> - start_quartz64(__dtb_rk3566_quartz64_a_start);
>> + rk3568_start(__dtb_rk3566_quartz64_a_start);
>> }
>
> Here __dtb_rk3566_quartz64_a_start is accessed before setup_c() has been
> called. That is not allowed, see the patch I just sent.
Does the refactoring make sense to you in general? Can I change it to
ENTRY_FUNCTION(start_my_fancy_board, r0, r1, r2)
{
setup_c();
rk3568_start(__dtb_my_fancy_board_start);
}
?
> BTW this patch breaks compilation, which is only fixed in 7/7:
>
> /ptx/work/WORK_EIHEI/sha/projects/barebox/barebox/arch/arm/boards/rockchip-rk3568-bpi-r2pro/lowlevel.c:14:22: error: conflicting types for 'rk3568_start'
> 14 | static noinline void rk3568_start(void)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from /ptx/work/WORK_EIHEI/sha/projects/barebox/barebox/arch/arm/boards/rockchip-rk3568-bpi-r2pro/lowlevel.c:10:
> /ptx/work/WORK_EIHEI/sha/projects/barebox/barebox/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/include/mach/rockchip.h:37:6: note: previous declaration of 'rk3568_start' was here
> 37 | void rk3568_start(void *fdt);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
Oops. The goal was to separate the changes that affect the BananaPi, but
in this case 6 + 7 need to be squashed. I guess Frank needs to object to
the combined patch if it breaks something on his side.
Best regards,
Michael
