Hi Ahmad, On Fri, Aug 05 2022 at 06:09 +0200, Ahmad Fatoum <ahmad@xxxxxx> wrote: > We have a proper abstraction for switches now, so drop this idea > from the list. > > Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <ahmad@xxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devel/project-ideas.rst | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devel/project-ideas.rst b/Documentation/devel/project-ideas.rst > index a3643298ab08..e49bfa6ca4da 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devel/project-ideas.rst > +++ b/Documentation/devel/project-ideas.rst > @@ -20,10 +20,8 @@ For GSoC, following barebox developers are mentoring: > - Rouven Czerwinski (IRC: ``Emantor``) > > This list can be edited and extended by sending patches to the mailing list. > -Other interesting ideas: Support for new file systems (EROFS, extfat, btrfs). > -Switch device framework (currently scripts write into a ``/dev/switch`` file > -to configure passthrough), Improvements for barebox-efi (e.g. as a coreboot > -payload), ... etc. > +Other interesting ideas: Support for new file systems (EROFS, extfat, btrfs), > +Improvements for barebox-efi (e.g. as a coreboot payload), ... etc. as a drive-by, could you fix s/Improvements/improvements/ as well? Best regards Ulrich > > Ideas listed below should contain a title, description, expected outcomes, > skills (and HW if any) required and a difficulty rating. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Ulrich Ölmann | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
