Hi Robin, On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 04:33:02PM +0200, Robin van der Gracht wrote: > Hi, > > Today I tried to run barebox with CONFIG_KEYBOARD_GPIO=y added to my config. > and noticed my board hangs during boot. When I modify the probe function to > run without registering the poller[1] it boots as expected. > > I started digging into the code to see how far the boot gets when I do > register the poller. I found that Barebox hangs in a do/while loop in > sdhci_transfer_data_dma[2]. > > The contents of the interrupt status (SDHCI_INT_STATUS) is 0 and stays that > way forever trapping the process in the loop. > > Call stack: > > initcall -> barebox_of_populate > state_probe drivers/misc/state.c > state_new_from_node common/state/state.c > of_find_path_by_node drivers/of/of_path.c > __of_find_path drivers/of/of_path.c > device_detect drivers/base/driver.c > mci_detect_card drivers/mci/mci-core.c > mci_card_probe drivers/mci/mci-core.c > mci_startup drivers/mci/mci-core.c > mci_startup_mmc drivers/mci/mci-core.c > mmc_compare_ext_csds drivers/mci/mci-core.c > mci_send_ext_csd drivers/mci/mci-core.c > mci_send_cmd drivers/mci/mci-core.c > esdhc_send_cmd > drivers/mci/imx-esdhc.c > __esdhc_send_cmd > drivers/mci/imx-esdhc-common.c > sdhci_transfer_data_dma drivers/mci/sdhci.c > > > I'm not sure how this happens. It's not the first transfer taking place. I > figured that mayby the poller[1] just adds some cpu load that opens up a > window for this to occur. > > Maybe something else cleared the status register right before we entered the > loop. Thats when I spotted this read/write construction[3]. It's executed > right before we enter the do/while loop and (over)writes to the irq status > register. > > I removed the line with the write command[3] and my board boots as expected. > Why are we (over)writing the status register right after reading it? The idea is likely that we clear the interrupts that we just handled. It seems by the time the status register is overwritten the DMA transfer is already ongoing, and in your case even already done. We should only ever clear the bits we have handled, like sdhci_transfer_data_dma() does with sdhci_write32(sdhci, SDHCI_INT_STATUS, SDHCI_INT_DMA); Apart from this line the code never checks the same bit twice, so clearing anything shoudn't be necessary. Clearing the status register once either at the start or the end of the function should be enough. I think the right thing to do is just to remove the erroneous status register write like you already did. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
