чт, 9 июн. 2022 г. в 23:08, Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hi Alexander,
> On 6/8/22 07:12, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > of_get_reset_source_priority() has no users,
> > so it can be safely removed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <eagle.alexander923@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > common/reset_source.c | 20 +++-----------------
> > include/reset_source.h | 7 -------
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/common/reset_source.c b/common/reset_source.c
> > index 3554cbd0fb..dccb683231 100644
> > --- a/common/reset_source.c
> > +++ b/common/reset_source.c
> > @@ -76,7 +76,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(reset_source_set_prinst);
> >
> > void reset_source_set_device(struct device_d *dev, enum reset_src_type st)
> > {
> > - int priority = of_get_reset_source_priority(dev->device_node);
> > + unsigned int priority = RESET_SOURCE_DEFAULT_PRIORITY;
> > +
> > + of_property_read_u32(node, "reset-source-priority", &priority);
>
> This seems to break my build:
> barebox/common/reset_source.c:81:30: error: 'node' undeclared (first use
> in this function)
> 81 | of_property_read_u32(node, "reset-source-priority",
> &priority);
> | ^~~~
>
> Should "node" be replaced by "dev->device_node"?
Hello.
You're right.
Unfortunately, I do not yet see this patch in the next branch to create a fixup.
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
