On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 06:34:43AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Sascha,
>
> On 18.05.20 09:08, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 01:46:36PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> >> This adds an easy way to enable the boot acknowledge function of
> >> a eMMC device, without the need to frob the EXT_CSD setting via
> >> the mmc_extcsd command.
> >> A boot ack is required whenever the boot partitions are read via
> >> the fast initialization boot protocol.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/mci/mci-core.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >> include/mci.h | 2 ++
> >> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mci/mci-core.c b/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> >> index f3718327f18d..d33bc0c1a41e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> >> @@ -516,6 +516,7 @@ static int mmc_change_freq(struct mci *mci)
> >>
> >> mci->ext_csd_part_config = mci->ext_csd[EXT_CSD_PARTITION_CONFIG];
> >> mci->bootpart = (mci->ext_csd_part_config >> 3) & 0x7;
> >> + mci->boot_ack_enable = (mci->ext_csd_part_config >> 6) & 0x1;
> >> }
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >> @@ -1592,6 +1593,17 @@ static int mci_set_boot(struct param_d *param, void *priv)
> >> EXT_CSD_PARTITION_CONFIG, mci->ext_csd_part_config);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static int mci_set_boot_ack(struct param_d *param, void *priv)
> >> +{
> >> + struct mci *mci = priv;
> >> +
> >> + mci->ext_csd_part_config &= ~(0x1 << 6);
> >> + mci->ext_csd_part_config |= mci->boot_ack_enable << 6;
> >> +
> >> + return mci_switch(mci,
> >> + EXT_CSD_PARTITION_CONFIG, mci->ext_csd_part_config);
> >> +}
> >
> > There's only one correct setting for each board or SoC. Instead of
> > letting the user choose between right and wrong, can't we add a hook to
> > be called from the board/SoC code? A device tree property might be an
> > option as well, something like barebox,enable-boot-ack.
> >
> > There are also bits to change the bus width after power up which might
> > need adjustments which would mean another parameter with the current
> > approach.
>
> There hasn't been any progress here for 2 years. Sascha, can we just
> take this patch? Even if we add code in future to have this happen as
> part of eMMC/SoC init, a device parameter to easily check
> the current configuration would still be useful.
Ok then, let's go for it.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
