Hi Andrej, On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 09:33:32AM +0200, Andrej Picej wrote: > Function first goes through all the aliases which have the given stem. > It then ensures that all the devices hiding under these aliases are > probed. > > User can specify one device_node which won't get probed. This is mainly > for avoiding recursion if the function will be called from device probe > function, or to specify the device which should get probed last. In the > later case the user should probe the last device manually. > > Signed-off-by: Andrej Picej <andrej.picej@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in v2: > - add check for deep probe support, > - users can now specify one device node, which won't get probed. This > ensures that one device can be probed last and we avoid recursion, if > this device happens to have alias, > - fix function name (ensured -> ensure). Your v2 came before I had a chance to react to your comments on v1, I was on vacation last week. I looked at the issue from another perspective and rather than ensuring a certain probe order I think we should decouple the GPIO numbers (at least the ones from the SoC internal controllers) from the probe order, see the patch I just sent. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
