On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:07:25PM -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
> This can help to determine what is causing the problem. E.g., is the
> bad byte always in the same eraseblock? Is it always 513 bytes into a
> page with a hardware ECC chunk size of 512 bytes?
>
> Example before and after (error at absolute address 123456 with 128kB
> eraseblock and 2kB page sizes):
>
> Byte 0xe240 is 12 should be 34
> Block 0x1 byte 0xe240 (page 0x1c offset 0x240) is 0x12 should be 0x34
>
> Signed-off-by: Trent Piepho <trent.piepho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> commands/nandtest.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks
Sascha
>
> diff --git a/commands/nandtest.c b/commands/nandtest.c
> index 1bb59c7fd..4a7db9cc7 100644
> --- a/commands/nandtest.c
> +++ b/commands/nandtest.c
> @@ -169,8 +169,10 @@ static int erase_and_write(loff_t ofs, unsigned char *data,
> printf("\ncompare failed. seed %d\n", seed);
> for (i = 0; i < meminfo.erasesize; i++) {
> if (data[i] != rbuf[i])
> - printf("Byte 0x%x is %02x should be %02x\n",
> - i, rbuf[i], data[i]);
> + printf("Block 0x%llx byte 0x%0x (page 0x%x offset 0x%x) is %02x should be %02x\n",
> + div64_ul(ofs, meminfo.erasesize), i,
> + i / meminfo.writesize, i % meminfo.writesize,
> + rbuf[i], data[i]);
> }
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
