Hi, On 2021-09-22 09:06, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > On 19.09.21 08:32, Peter Rosin wrote: >> However, the above also means that the quotes around the >> "regressions" word in the subject can be removed. The problems >> are squarely in the upstream code base, and I do need fixes >> for region overlap, eXecute Never and RO_DATA_SECTION. > > I am interested in understanding how that breakage came about. > I have a sama5d3_xplained here with NAND, which I will try to > find some time to reproduce this on. > > For your immediate issue: I'd like to use the occasion to get > all sama5d3 to probe from device tree. We already have one > sama5d3 DT-enabled board upstream (microchip-ksz9477-evb) and > I just CC'd you on a series to migrate the sama5d3_xplained > from legacy board code to DT. I tested this boots correctly > after at91bootstrap from NAND without your series here. > > The relevant defconfig is at91_multi_defconfig. It will generate > a barebox-sama5d3-xplained.img, which should boot to shell > on your board. > > If that works, we could create a new barebox-sama5d3xek.img image > that does the same as barebox-sama5d3-xplained.img, but with > different device tree and see if all peripherals you use > still work. > > > With everything nice and dandy, we could finally remove non-DT > code for sama5d3 altogether and your board would reuse the same > early bootstrap code basically all other platforms use and test. > > Sounds good? That sounds like the right way to fix things. Thanks! Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
