On 07.06.21 16:12, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Return successfully from clk_set_rate() when the rate is already the
> desired one. This prevents a failure in clk_set_rate() when the current
> clock doesn't have a set_rate hook.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 8b90f30486..ba726c342c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -169,6 +169,9 @@ int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> if (IS_ERR(clk))
> return PTR_ERR(clk);
>
> + if (clk_get_rate(clk) == clk_round_rate(clk, rate))
> + return 0;
> +
> if (!clk->ops->set_rate)
> return -ENOSYS;
This means we can drop 459bf1fd31da ("ARM: clk: rk3188: don't set same
clk rate twice"), right?
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
