Hi Sascha, just wanted to let you know that the kernel patch has been accepted and is included in the pull request for 5.13. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mtd/linux.git/log/?h=nand/for-5.13 Regards, Stefan On Mon, 2021-03-29 at 07:20 +0000, Stefan Riedmüller wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > here is the link to the kernel patch. > Sorry, I forgot to put you in cc. > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-mtd/patch/20210325102337.481172-1-s.riedmueller@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Stefan > > On Mon, 2021-03-22 at 06:59 +0100, sha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 05:14:05PM +0000, Stefan Riedmüller wrote: > > > Hi Sascha, > > > > > > On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 10:41 +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > Hi Stefan, > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:36:26PM +0100, Stefan Riedmueller wrote: > > > > > The blocks containing the bad block table can become bad as well. So > > > > > make sure to skip any blocks that are marked bad when searching for > > > > > the > > > > > bad block table. > > > > > > > > The file is a more or less direct copy from the kernel. Does the > > > > problem > > > > exist in the kernel as well? > > > > > > From my point of view I would say yes. I have just made a small test > > > Issue > > > is > > > shown in the kernel as well. It is a very raw case where two BBT blocks > > > need > > > to be worn out but on the other hand this fix should not have that much > > > of > > > an > > > impact. > > > > > > I will send a similar patch to the kernel. > > > > I'd like to delay this one until it is accepted in the kernel. I do not > > fully understand the consequences of this patch, but hopefully on the > > mtd list there is someone. > > > > Sascha > > > _______________________________________________ > barebox mailing list > barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
