Re: RISC-V: erizo: large gap between bss and stack regions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:54:27 +0200
Sascha Hauer <sha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:54:22AM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> > Hi Ahmad!
> > 
> > Here is the iomem command output on erizo:
> > 
> > barebox:/ iomem
> > 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (size 0x00000000) iomem
> >   0x80000000 - 0x807fffff (size 0x00800000) ram0
> >     0x804ffd00 - 0x805ffcff (size 0x00100000) malloc space
> >     0x805ffd00 - 0x805fffe6 (size 0x000002e7) board data
> >     0x80600000 - 0x80636b1f (size 0x00036b20) barebox
> >     0x80636b20 - 0x8063ec9b (size 0x0000817c) barebox data
> >     0x8063ec9c - 0x80643147 (size 0x000044ac) bss
> >     0x807e0000 - 0x807fffff (size 0x00020000) stack
> >   0x90000000 - 0x9000001f (size 0x00000020) 90000000.uart@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >   0x91000000 - 0x91000003 (size 0x00000004) 91000000.gpio@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >   0x91000004 - 0x91000007 (size 0x00000004) 91000000.gpio@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > I see large unused region between bss and stack regions (>1600 Kbytes).
> 
> That's normal. The compressed barebox knows the size of the uncompressed
> barebox, but it doesn't know the size of the bss segment above it. For
> that reason we have a very pessimistic estimate of:
> 
> #define MAX_BSS_SIZE SZ_1M
> 
> The barebox binary itself is then aligned to the previous 1MiB
> boundary, so barebox usually starts at 2MiB below the end of SDRAM.
> That's a bit wasteful for boards with very little memory like the erizo,
> but that's how things are at the moment.

Can we make it configurable via Kconfig?

-- 
Best regards,
  Antony Pavlov

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux