The message didn't explicitly say it is expected behavior to not find barebox-state on startup. Reword the message to make this clearer. Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <ahmad@xxxxxx> --- arch/sandbox/board/env/init/state | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/sandbox/board/env/init/state b/arch/sandbox/board/env/init/state index 0b8e40409f97..b8a2b42a53ea 100644 --- a/arch/sandbox/board/env/init/state +++ b/arch/sandbox/board/env/init/state @@ -5,8 +5,9 @@ fi source /env/data/ansi-colors echo -e $CYAN -echo "******************************************************************" -echo "*** Inconsistent barebox state buckets detected on first boot ***" -echo "*** barebox will repair them on next shutdown ***" -echo "*****************************************************************" +echo "*******************************************************" +echo "*** Inconsistent barebox state buckets detected ***" +echo "*** This is normal for a first boot ***" +echo "*** barebox will repair them on next poweroff/reset ***" +echo "*******************************************************" echo -e -n $NC -- 2.30.0 _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
