Hello, On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 08:17:41AM +0100, Yann Sionneau wrote: > Hello, > > I am adding Stafford Horne in CC, as I think he might want to help about > openrisc port :) > > Cheers > > Yann > > On 23/02/2021 10:59, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Hi Franck, Antony > > > > Are you still interested in barebox support for NIOS2 and openrisc? If > > not I would consider removing it. Background is that we are planning to > > introduce green threads and implement pollers with them which makes > > green threads rather mandatory. Green threads need a setjmp/longjmp > > implementation that would have to be added for these architectures. > > > > Keeping the architectures is no big deal normally, but I don't want to > > add untested new functionality, also I don't want to implement things > > that nobody uses, so if you are still interested it would be great if > > you volunteer to implement setjmp/longjmp. I am the maintainer of most OpenRISC things right now. I would be happy to help, but I don't really use barebox right now. Most of my deployments I use with litex FPGA SoC's that has its own bootloader. That said, we have a setjmp/longjmp implementation in our glibc port which I have been testing for upstreaming lately. https://github.com/stffrdhrn/or1k-glibc/blob/or1k-port-2/sysdeps/or1k/setjmp.S https://github.com/stffrdhrn/or1k-glibc/blob/or1k-port-2/sysdeps/or1k/__longjmp.S I had a look at the barebox docs and openrisc port, it seems like there is support for our standard platform, or1ksim, which is the same as my de0-nano fpga board/soc and qemu. I should be able to make use of this. Is there a branch where you are doing the green thread work? I could add and test the OpenRISC implementation. -Stafford _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
