On 10.02.21 09:51, Rouven Czerwinski wrote: > Hi Marcel > > On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 09:36 +0100, barebox+mailing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> Hey everyone, >> >> we use barebox-state in conjunction with systemd on our platform. >> We removed all legacy programs and paths (in systemd terms), so is `/var/lock` removed as well. >> >> Lennart Poettering decribed it in a github issue why /var/lock is bad (and the reason why it's not pupolated per default): https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/15668#issuecomment-623069821 >> >> So for now our option is to create /var/lock via tmpfiles so barebox-state can use them. >> >> I would like to see a upstream fix for this, where barebox uses its own directory, e.g. `/run/barebox/lock` or similar. >> >> I'm not sure if this breaks anything on older systems, maybe you can think about it for a second. >> >> Please let me know what you think the best approach would be. > > Since barebox-state is part of the dt-utils software suite, questions > should be directed to oss-tools@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Feel free to send > patches changing the locking directory to this address as well. There's already a patch for that: https://www.mail-archive.com/oss-tools@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg00063.html > > Regards, > Rouven Czerwinski > > > _______________________________________________ > barebox mailing list > barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox > -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
