Hi Ahmad, On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:51:18AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > Hello Jules, > > On 27.01.21 17:49, Jules Maselbas wrote: > > File system operation shouldn't be executed in a poller. Use > > a workqueue to delay filesystem operation to command context. > > > > This is an RFC, extra work must be done to properly handle error > > cases and dfu cleanup. > > I erroneously thought the poller is within the DFU bits. I wonder what > side-effect moving the whole USB gadget polling into a workqueue would > have. In that case, we wouldn't need to any changes for DFU itself. > If I understood correctly you're suggesting to wrap the entire dfu gadget inside a poller. I have not tried this and it might work. However wrapping each fs operation allow the dfu gadget to respond to GET_STATUS queries will erase/write operation are on-going. Jules _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
