On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 10:31:57AM +0300, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/dts/imx51-ccxmx51.dts | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/imx51-ccxmx51.dts b/arch/arm/dts/imx51-ccxmx51.dts
> index efe5dbf63..4aa32e4c8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/dts/imx51-ccxmx51.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/imx51-ccxmx51.dts
> @@ -31,11 +31,11 @@
>
> partition@c0000 {
> label = "kernel";
> - reg = <0xc0000 0x340000>;
> + reg = <0xc0000 0x400000>;
> };
This is an incompatible change to the partitioning, so a board won't
boot anymore when only barebox is updated. If you do the step, wouldn't
it make sense to increase the kernel partition a bit more to be future
proof for a bit longer?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
