On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:18:39AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> On 7/22/20 11:12 AM, Jules Maselbas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 08:36:25AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >> On 7/21/20 2:05 PM, Jules Maselbas wrote:
> >>> +static int transfer_chunk(struct dwc2 *dwc2, u8 hc,
> >>> + u8 *pid, int in, void *buffer, int num_packets,
> >>> + int xfer_len, int *actual_len, int odd_frame)
> >>> +{
> >>> + uint32_t hctsiz, hcchar, sub;
> >>> + dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> >>> + int ret = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + dma_addr = dma_map_single(dwc2->dev, buffer, xfer_len,
> >>> + in ? DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >>> +
> >>> + dwc2_dbg(dwc2, "chunk: pid=%d xfer_len=%u pkts=%u dma_addr=%llx\n",
> >>> + *pid, xfer_len, num_packets, dma_addr);
> >>
> >> Use %da for printing dma_addr, otherwise on 32-bit builds with #define DEBUG,
> >> garbage would be read here.
> > Yup sounds good, from what i've seen in vsprintf.c it's '%ad' to print
> > dma_addr_t.
>
> Sorry, I misread the code.
> Apparently, it's neither. It should be %pad for dma_addr_t.
>
oh! you're right.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
