On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 11:02:02AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Linux v5.8-rc1 adds partitions to the flash@0 node, which now overlap
> with the partitions we define and resulting in errors:
>
> ERROR: m25p0.barebox: New partition m25p0.barebox conflicts
> with m25p0.at91bootstrap
> ERROR: m25p0.barebox-environment: New partition
> m25p0.barebox-environment conflicts with m25p0.bootloader
>
> We don't want to reuse those partitions as their name may and probably
> will change (they have leading zeroes in the unit address).
> We could use the &{/path/to/partition} syntax, but that might be broken
> soon as well, as the nodes aren't inside a partitions node with a
> "fixed-partitions" compatible.
> The busses also don't align with the yaml schema and might be renamed.
>
> Nuke the full flash@0 node and supply ours and avoid these problems.
> The offsets of the partitions have been adjusted to coincide with the
> upstream offsets for second stage bootloader and environment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <ahmad@xxxxxx>
> ---
> Hello Sascha,
>
> The brekage doesn't seem to end..
> if possible please reorder before v5.8-rc1 dts/ sync.
> ---
I haven't reordered it, please see if you are happy with the result
anyway. It looks like I would have to put the whole at91 stack before
the dts updates, I rather don't do that.
Regards,
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
