When ramfs fails to allocate more memory then returning -ENOSPC is
more appropriate then -ENOMEM.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ramfs.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ramfs.c b/fs/ramfs.c
index 341b6130de..800b03af29 100644
--- a/fs/ramfs.c
+++ b/fs/ramfs.c
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static int ramfs_truncate(struct device_d *dev, FILE *f, loff_t size)
} else {
node->data = ramfs_get_chunk();
if (!node->data)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return -ENOSPC;
data = node->data;
oldchunks = 1;
}
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int ramfs_truncate(struct device_d *dev, FILE *f, loff_t size)
while (newchunks > oldchunks) {
data->next = ramfs_get_chunk();
if (!data->next)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return -ENOSPC;
data = data->next;
oldchunks++;
}
--
2.27.0
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
