Hello Roland, On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 02:55:56PM +0200, Roland Hieber wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 02:10:47PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > On 5/19/20 6:52 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c > > > index a06040ac3268..1e2db39def22 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c > > > @@ -1,13 +1,5 @@ > > > -/* > > > - * Copyright 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. > > > - * > > > - * The code contained herein is licensed under the GNU General Public > > > - * License. You may obtain a copy of the GNU General Public License > > > - * Version 2 or later at the following locations: > > > - * > > > - * http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.html > > > - * http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html > > > - */ > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > > > > The deleted text says "or later" > > Ah, I stumbled over this too. The deleted text says: > > "The code contained herein is licensed under the GNU General Public > License." > > which in itself reads like "you can use any version of the GPL" (i.e., > GPL-1.0-or-later). Later then the text says: > > "You may obtain a copy of the GNU General Public License > Version 2 or later at the following locations:" > > which in my opinion does not say anything about which version of the GPL > the code is licensed under. This seems to be a problem in the Freescale template. I think I pointed that out once, but nothing changed. For practical reasons I'd interpret that as "GPL-2.0-or-later". Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
