On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 08:49:33AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 3/31/20 8:41 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> >> + pwm1 = &{/soc/timer@44000000/pwm};
> >> + pwm2 = &{/soc/timer@40000000/pwm};
> >> + pwm3 = &{/soc/timer@40001000/pwm};
> >> + pwm4 = &{/soc/timer@40002000/pwm};
> >> + pwm5 = &{/soc/timer@40003000/pwm};
> >> + pwm8 = &{/soc/timer@44001000/pwm};
> >> + pwm12 = &{/soc/timer@40006000/pwm};
> >> + pwm13 = &{/soc/timer@40007000/pwm};
> >> + pwm14 = &{/soc/timer@40008000/pwm};
> >> + pwm15 = &{/soc/timer@44006000/pwm};
> >> + pwm16 = &{/soc/timer@44007000/pwm};
> >> + pwm17 = &{/soc/timer@44008000/pwm};
> >
> > The other aliases start counting at 0. Why not the PWMs?
>
> I named them to match the SoC data sheet,
>
> The final device names are e.g. pwm12ch2, corresponding to TIM12_CH2
> in the SoC datasheet. It's IMO the best user experience, because otherwise
> you'll always have to look at the aliases in barebox to determine,
> which PWM corresponds to what's printed in the schematics.
ok.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
