From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The setter sets a value unused anywhere, but in the getter.
As the functions are unused, just drop them.
There's pwm_config that can be used for this instead.
Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pwm/core.c | 10 ----------
include/pwm.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index cae23c98ee2d..eaf7de18295e 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -265,16 +265,6 @@ unsigned int pwm_get_period(struct pwm_device *pwm)
return pwm->period_ns;
}
-void pwm_set_duty_cycle(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int duty_ns)
-{
- pwm->duty_ns = duty_ns;
-}
-
-unsigned int pwm_get_duty_cycle(struct pwm_device *pwm)
-{
- return pwm->duty_ns;
-}
-
/*
* pwm_enable - start a PWM output toggling
*/
diff --git a/include/pwm.h b/include/pwm.h
index 98af1299748a..9897e86545c9 100644
--- a/include/pwm.h
+++ b/include/pwm.h
@@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ void pwm_disable(struct pwm_device *pwm);
void pwm_set_period(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int period);
unsigned int pwm_get_period(struct pwm_device *pwm);
-void pwm_set_duty_cycle(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int duty);
-unsigned int pwm_get_duty_cycle(struct pwm_device *pwm);
struct pwm_chip;
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
